--- Zoltan Varga <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Hi, > > Keep in mind that mono currently doesn't support > code access security (CAS), so running assemblies > containing untrusted CIL code is not a very safe > thing to do.
You've both touched on the big issue here: should we be just running LSL on Mono as a new, faster virtual machine or look at LSL as just one language and aim towards running any language which compiles to CIL within SL? I've been keeping the former as a fallback position, but now I'm starting to work on implementing memory quotas and bytecode threading, which would both be much easier implemented in the LSL compiler than as general solutions for any language which targets the CLR, it would be good to make a decision one way or the other. Obviously it's a question we need to decide on, but I'd like to hear as many opinions from the mono community as possible. How long is it likely to be before CAS can be used in anger? Are there any other issues that would affect going down the multi-language route? Cheers, Jim. ___________________________________________________________ How much free photo storage do you get? Store your holiday snaps for FREE with Yahoo! Photos http://uk.photos.yahoo.com _______________________________________________ Mono-devel-list mailing list Mono-devel-list@lists.ximian.com http://lists.ximian.com/mailman/listinfo/mono-devel-list