I remember that MSBuild originally did not use the GAC. Then they changed their minds. A brief summary of the situation is given in http://channel9.msdn.com/wiki/default.aspx/MSBuild.MsbuildAssembliesInTheGac. I do wish that they had elaborated on the problems that putting the assemblies in the GAC created.
On Sunday 26 June 2005 3:27 pm, Ben Maurer wrote: > Of course, one other advantage of non-gac'd installs is that they are > more relocatable. In fact, you could do xcopy deploy that way. It really > only makes sense to use the GAC if what you are deploying is a shared > library, right? _______________________________________________ Mono-devel-list mailing list Mono-devel-list@lists.ximian.com http://lists.ximian.com/mailman/listinfo/mono-devel-list
