Don't think about performance on this one, because the loss will be
absolutely unmeasurable (or at least extremely small) unless you want to
stream byte by byte.
It is quite possible, that the mono jit will inline that code anyways...
Just create an abstract base class (or interface) and then inherit and
you're done.
Andreas
----- Original Message -----
From: "Dominik Pich" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <mono-devel-list@lists.ximian.com>
Sent: Thursday, July 28, 2005 7:32 PM
Subject: [Mono-devel-list] [off topic] mono/.net pure managed
wrapperlibraries
Ok, I'm aware this is offtopic but hey :) it is _RELATED_ to mono in so
far that I think about using it :P
So... my situation:
I have managed code written using ms .NET which uses MS managed wrapper
for WMP.
I'd like to port that code to osx using mono and as I then dont have WMP
but QuickTime, I thought I'd write a wrapper that on WINDOWS uses WMP and
on OSX uses QuickTime.
So far so good... ;)
Instead of:
on Windows I got: MyApp -> managed WMP -> WMP
on OSX I got: MyApp -> managed QuickTime -> QuickTime
I add the add. 'wrapper layer' so I have a common API:
on Win/osx: MyApp -> managed Media Player -> managed WMP
(win) -> WMP
->
managed QuickTime (osx) -> Quicktime
Now Im thinking about the performance decrease of such an add. 'wrapper
layer' and wonder if I could 'inline' it ... so I dont have the wrapper
in the compiled code:
I write:
oMediaPlayer->play();
and it compiles to either
QTplayer->play()
WMPplayer->play()
... or do I worry to much?
Thanks,
Dominik
_______________________________________________
Mono-devel-list mailing list
Mono-devel-list@lists.ximian.com
http://lists.ximian.com/mailman/listinfo/mono-devel-list
_______________________________________________
Mono-devel-list mailing list
Mono-devel-list@lists.ximian.com
http://lists.ximian.com/mailman/listinfo/mono-devel-list
