Any update on those patches? The incompatible version numbers prevents using MS.NET bootstraped compiler on mono, so it would be nice to make mono more up to date.
Kornel, I could help in creating the patch. 05-07-29, Kornél Pál <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> napisał(a): > > Disk space is cheap. I can get disk space for under $0.50 per Gigabyte. > > If you want to measure performance gains, they have to be in terms of > > time (reducing the number of pages read from disk: ie, show that you > > save at least 1 page from being read from the disk) or memory (show that > > you save at least one page of memory from being allocated due to mallocs > > that you save or from being kept paged in by the OS). > > I belive that altough we could add some random rubbish to compiled files > like VB6 compiler does it's better not to include any unnecessary data in > files. The point of view hardware is cheap is not good I think. Users could > buy faster CPU and more RAM as well altough it is more expensive than HDD. > Saying we don't care about HDD is the same as Microsoft does and their > operating system is expanding without limits.:) > > >>From Kornel: > >> BTW what about the 2.0.0.0 patch? > > > > I'd still like to kill all the #if NET_1_1 crap in the files and use > > MonoConsts.FxVersion or something. It will save us pain in the future. > > In this case I would like to do some more AssemblyInfo.cs centralization > (movig common attributes to a common file and using a common set of > attributes in all the assemblies with MS.NET attributes in mind of course) > and cleanup because AssemblyInfo.cs files are a bit anarchistic currently. > And adding AssemblyFileVersion attributes to all of the assemblies with the > version you currently emit to the common MonoVersion.cs. And emit a contant > instead of AssemblyVersion attribute that can be used in a common file. > > Is it OK? (I mean on OK that in addition that it meats your/our plans on > Mono it will be approved if the patch is correct, without saying that we > want to wait until next millenium or 101 other patches should be committed > before that one. Because I don't like to waste time on patches that will not > be approved in a resonable time.) > > Kornél > > _______________________________________________ > Mono-devel-list mailing list > Mono-devel-list@lists.ximian.com > http://lists.ximian.com/mailman/listinfo/mono-devel-list > -- Kamil Skalski http://nazgul.omega.pl
_______________________________________________ Mono-devel-list mailing list Mono-devel-list@lists.ximian.com http://lists.ximian.com/mailman/listinfo/mono-devel-list
