Hello, > This patch is quite big. The 2.0.0.0 patch was much smaller but you wanted > this bigger one.:) It may be more difficult to review but will result in a > much reliable class library.
Did we get this patch on SVN yet? > > It contains only assembly version related things nothing else. Note that I > corrected all the version issues I found in any file type. For example: > v2.0.40607 -> v2.0.50215 (config) > 1:0:33000:0 -> 1:0:3300:0 (comment) > 1.0.3102.0 -> 1.0.3300.0 (resx) > > I did not modify any InformationalVersion or FileVersion attributes but they > should be modified at a later time. > > I did not modified tests to use the common Consts.cs because they are > designed differently but I updated the version numbers to 2.0.0.0. > > I did not added any ChangeLog entry and I'm not going to do it by hand. If > you want to have ChangeLog entries please let me know how can I generate > them. > > To Ben: > >I am sick of explaining that this task is in fact quite easy. > > The idea behind this task is easy to understand but actually it took a lot > of hours to create this patch as all the results has to be examined even > with regular expressions matching only the right version numbers. > > Kornél > _______________________________________________ > Mono-devel-list mailing list > Mono-devel-list@lists.ximian.com > http://lists.ximian.com/mailman/listinfo/mono-devel-list -- Miguel de Icaza <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> _______________________________________________ Mono-devel-list mailing list Mono-devel-list@lists.ximian.com http://lists.ximian.com/mailman/listinfo/mono-devel-list
