On Sun, 2005-10-02 at 23:15 +0200, Zoltan Varga wrote: > I still don't really understand this. For example, this line in the > patch seems > completely unneccesary: > > libmono_la_LIBADD = \ > - $(libs) > + $(libs) $(GLIB_LIBS) $(GMODULE_LIBS) -ldl > > Since $(libs) already contains $(GLIB_LIBS) and $(GMODULE_LIBS), and > $(GMODULE_LIBS) contains -ldl. > > Also, how should I check whenever the current mono sources have this 'bug' ?
you are right, $(libs) contains all the needed libraries for linking. I think the bug was that it was missing some libraries for linking which will generate a library with unresolved symbol names. As the bugreport says ld -r was listed unresolved symbols to other library files... since it's fixed, we can ignore it (the bug was reported against some mono 1.0.x release btw...) I will also delete that patch from the debian/patches directory. -- Regards, Mirco 'meebey' Bauer PGP-Key: http://keyserver.noreply.org/pks/lookup?op=get&search=0xEEF946C8 -----BEGIN GEEK CODE BLOCK----- Version: 3.12 GIT d s-:+ a-- C++ UL++++$ P L++$>+++$ E- W+++$ N o? K- w++>! O---- M- V? PS PE+ Y- PGP++ t 5+ X++ R tv+ b+ DI? D+ G>++ e h! r->++ y? ------END GEEK CODE BLOCK------
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
_______________________________________________ Mono-devel-list mailing list Mono-devel-list@lists.ximian.com http://lists.ximian.com/mailman/listinfo/mono-devel-list
