Monodoc would need a "profile chooser" or something like that to switch between 1.x and 2.0 profile, right? Any plans on those things?

Btw anyone knows why the C# specification appears without newlines?

On 9/30/05, Miguel de Icaza <[EMAIL PROTECTED] > wrote:
Hello,

> When will monodoc be ready for .NET 2.0 classes? (ie, when will it
> also allow to document generics)

We will have to wait for someone to contribute the necessary code to
cope with this.  I have not had much time to look into this issue.

What needs to be done is:

        * Look at the new ECMA XML documentation from ECMA and evaluate
          how we could bring those changes into our documentation.

        * Someone would have to port the new docs nonetheless.

        * Someone would have to architect the changes to the monodoc
          engine to do so.

The right place to discuss this is the mono-docs-list.

That being said, if you can not wait to write some documentation, we
have a *lot* of stuff in the 1.x profile that needs documentation.
Considering that 2.x stuff wont be 100% supported for a while, maybe it
would be best to contribute to the 1.x effort.

_______________________________________________
Mono-devel-list mailing list
Mono-devel-list@lists.ximian.com
http://lists.ximian.com/mailman/listinfo/mono-devel-list



--
Alexandre Gomes, Portugal
_______________________________________________
Mono-devel-list mailing list
Mono-devel-list@lists.ximian.com
http://lists.ximian.com/mailman/listinfo/mono-devel-list

Reply via email to