Yap, removing this would be nice and it would bring nunit-console on 2.0 profile one step closer to being usable outside the mono build tree (see http://lists.ximian.com/pipermail/mono-devel-list/2005-September/014598.html)
This is a deviation from original nunit.org sources though. Still, the most difficult problem with nunit for 2.0 is that we need to store somehow the 2.0 version of nunit assemblies and the current versioning/numbering scheme does not give a clean way for this. Nunit assemblies are currently installed into the GAC under 2.2.0.0 version number (and are compiler for 1.1 profile). 2005/10/23, Atsushi Eno <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > Hello, > > Do we have to specify supportedRuntime and requiredRuntime in > nunit-console.exe.config? If we omit those sections, we can run > "make PROFILE=net_2_0 run-test-ondotnet" to verify our NUnit test > sanity (i.e. check if they don't fail under .NET 2.0) on Windows. > > If there is no need, then the attached patch would make it possible. > > Atsushi Eno > > > Index: nunit-console.exe.config > =================================================================== > --- nunit-console.exe.config (revision 52109) > +++ nunit-console.exe.config (working copy) > @@ -23,11 +23,13 @@ > --> > <startup> > > +<!-- > <supportedRuntime version="v1.1.4322" /> > <supportedRuntime version="v2.0.50215" /> > <supportedRuntime version="v1.0.3705" /> > > <requiredRuntime version="v1.0.3705" /> > +--> > > </startup> > > @@ -89,4 +91,4 @@ > > </runtime> > > -</configuration> > \ No newline at end of file > +</configuration> > > _______________________________________________ > Mono-devel-list mailing list > Mono-devel-list@lists.ximian.com > http://lists.ximian.com/mailman/listinfo/mono-devel-list > > > -- Kamil Skalski http://nazgul.omega.pl _______________________________________________ Mono-devel-list mailing list Mono-devel-list@lists.ximian.com http://lists.ximian.com/mailman/listinfo/mono-devel-list
