Piotr Zurek wrote: > Andrés G. Aragoneses [ knocte ] wrote: > >> My personal opinion is that the best priority should be to finish the >> port of MonoDevelop to Windows. > > Instead of porting things back and forth (MD was started as SharpDevelop > port) it would be just great if the contribution would make our life > easier. Something like getting the debugger to work...
Did somebody say debugger? :) I'd say thats the quickest trip to Mono fame: a debugger integrated into MonoDevelop. Microsoft VisualStudio has provided excellent integrated debugger support for a long time. Many Windows developers view the lack of an integrated and easy to use debugger as a showstopper for developing on a *nix platform. Now if ASP.NET support could be polished up and MonoDevelop had integrated xsp/ASP.NET debugging - that'd be huge. VisualStudio's ASP.NET debugging while powerful, is extremely flaky, so its an area where Mono could even beat the competition. Just the $0.02 of a mono-devel lurker... feel free to ignore. :) Michael _______________________________________________ Mono-devel-list mailing list Mono-devel-list@lists.ximian.com http://lists.ximian.com/mailman/listinfo/mono-devel-list
