Hi Atsushi, > No one practically uses NAnt on cygwin (it is obvious as NAnt > never supports cygwin-considered buid/installation system and > no one complained about that). > > Considering that there are many many additional things that > depends on make like standalone tests, there is no better > development environment than cygwin on Windows. > > Having build depencency just for dogfooding isn't a good idea. > Every time the build got broken somehow, it will mess every > hackers until the problem goes away. Have you joined the > development and tasted that pain?
Are you making this statement with regard to building Mono or applications that run on Mono? If it's the first, I agree. For applications, it seems as if standardizing on NAnt is a valid choice to be made by the application developers and might even be a preferred choice since it allows one build to work on all platforms. Or am I missing some issue of deployment that NAnt cannot handle? [BTW, I'm currently deciding how to deploy NUnitLite, so it's a pretty central question for me.] Charlie _______________________________________________ Mono-devel-list mailing list Mono-devel-list@lists.ximian.com http://lists.ximian.com/mailman/listinfo/mono-devel-list
