On 10/20/06, Leszek Ciesielski <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On 10/20/06, Marek Sieradzki <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > On 10/20/06, Leszek Ciesielski <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > On 10/20/06, Marek Sieradzki <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > On 10/20/06, Leszek Ciesielski <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > > Hi, > > > > > > > > > > attached is a patch fixing minor attribute differences between mono > > > > > and ms.net, and containing stubs for (some of) missing classes. > > > > > Permission to commit? > > > > > > > > > Hi, > > > > > > > > AssemblyInfo.cs changes are questionable. If there's a good reason for > > > > them please specify it. > > > > > > Those attributes are present in MS.Net assembly ( consult eg. mono > > > class status). Other that that - none, I dubt mono supports them at > > > this time (meaning "pays any heed to them", I know compiler generates > > > them properly). It's just a small increase in compatibility, when I > > > could see no problems on our side. I do not want to argue, but if you > > > are against applying them, please specify a reason :-) > > > > > I asked Miguel some time ago about that. Mono is based on msdn + ecma > > docs. If specific attribute isn't obvious/needed nor documented it shouldn't > > be added. Or at least it's the way I understood it. > > Patch with the class stubs again. This time without changes to > assembly attributes and with correct (consistent with module style) > formatting. Also, this one contains two more stubs. Permission to > commit?
Yes. _______________________________________________ Mono-devel-list mailing list Mono-devel-list@lists.ximian.com http://lists.ximian.com/mailman/listinfo/mono-devel-list