mmm, never mind, Robert already fixed it in svn (r67496) Atsushi Eno
Atsushi Eno wrote: > Hello, > >> The code I posted originally in the bug report might have been a little >> misleading. >> I did an additional comment with more appropriate code later. > > Ah, ok now I think I was misunderstanding the issue. So, the issue > really is in WaitHandle or somewhere inside it, as it should not > expect non-null entry assembly. > >> I wasn't realy sure where the real bug belonged >> System.Reflection.Assembly or System.Runtime.WaitHandle. >> There seems to ba a patch posted for that already (great job guys!!) for >> System.Runtime.WaitHandle, >> so I assume the problem was there. > > Where is the patch? Seems like it should be applied (unless it is > wrong). > > Atsushi Eno > > > _______________________________________________ > Mono-devel-list mailing list > Mono-devel-list@lists.ximian.com > http://lists.ximian.com/mailman/listinfo/mono-devel-list > _______________________________________________ Mono-devel-list mailing list Mono-devel-list@lists.ximian.com http://lists.ximian.com/mailman/listinfo/mono-devel-list