Alan McGovern wrote: >> > Have you tried FileStream.Flush()? ;) >> >> Flush() intentionally doesn't call fsync nor FlushFileBuffers. > > > Well, the original reason cited for a cross platform fsync() call was to > perform a flush to disk operation on a filestream. I believe that's > *exactly* what FileStream.Flush() is for. So unless there's a different > reason that he needs fsync(), what's wrong with calling FileStream.Flush()?
The performance would be extremely bad if those calls would be performed by FileStream.Flush. Have a look at the man page of fsync(2) and FlushFileBuffers(). Robert _______________________________________________ Mono-devel-list mailing list Mono-devel-list@lists.ximian.com http://lists.ximian.com/mailman/listinfo/mono-devel-list
