Hi Robert,

I was revisiting the code and there must be 2 checks, but one is for sealed
class and one for sealed method, but obviously the patch is wrong, thanks
for spoting!
About the string_ctor check should be removed as well.

Rodrigo

On 5/25/07, Robert Jordan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:

Hey,

Rodrigo Kumpera wrote:
> The following patch perform simple devirtualization based on the sealed
> flag
> of methods and types.
>
> The patch makes pystone 4% faster with IronPython 2.0 and 1% faster with
> IronPython 1.0. It should improve other benchmarks as well, since it
main
> contribution is statically dispatching delegate.Invoke. To provide more
> broad results a sse pass that perform type propagation is needed.
>
> The only thing I'm not sure about this patch is if it should handle
> remoting
> wrappers is some sort of way.

> --- inssel.brg        (revision 77933)
> +++ inssel.brg        (working copy)
> @@ -1690,6 +1690,17 @@
>                       method = ((MonoCallInst*)tree)->method =
mono_marshal_get_remoting_invoke_with_check (method);
>               }
>
> +             MONO_EMIT_NEW_UNALU (cfg, OP_CHECK_THIS, -1, this_reg);
> +
> +             tree->dreg = state->reg1;
> +             tree->opcode = novirtop;
> +             mono_bblock_add_inst (cfg->cbb, tree);
> +             return;
> +     }
> +
> +     if ((method->flags & METHOD_ATTRIBUTE_VIRTUAL) &&
> +             ((method->klass->flags & TYPE_ATTRIBUTE_SEALED) ||
> +                     (method->klass->flags & TYPE_ATTRIBUTE_SEALED))) {

One of the TYPE_ATTRIBUTE_SEALED checks is redundant.
You probably want method->flags & METHOD_ATTRIBUTE_FINAL.

>               if (!method->string_ctor)

The string ctor is probably not virtual, so you should leave the check
where it was.

I'd rather remove the 2nd branch at all and put the
method->klass->flags & TYPE_ATTRIBUTE_SEALED check in the existing one.

I didn't test it, though.


Robert

_______________________________________________
Mono-devel-list mailing list
Mono-devel-list@lists.ximian.com
http://lists.ximian.com/mailman/listinfo/mono-devel-list

_______________________________________________
Mono-devel-list mailing list
Mono-devel-list@lists.ximian.com
http://lists.ximian.com/mailman/listinfo/mono-devel-list

Reply via email to