Thanks Robert. So, you mean it is better to pass an array of objects than actually a list?? Ok, I was already using arrays but I'll take it into account...
pablo ----- Original Message ----- From: "Robert Jordan" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: <mono-devel-list@lists.ximian.com> Sent: Friday, August 03, 2007 10:52 AM Subject: Re: [Mono-dev] Serialization performance + remoting > Hi Pablo, > > pablosantosluac wrote: >> Because the people who actually implemented both serialization and >> remoting >> are in this list :-) I'd like to ask them to share with us some tips to >> improve performance in serialization/remoting: I don't know, maybe always >> reduce the number of objects involved (unwrap the structures into >> communication specific ones), get rid of some methods, avoid some data >> types... whatever... > > Employing a remoting facade is the way to go, IMHO, even if it's > not that hype. Try to keep the data exchange classes as flat as possible > (struct-like, avoid lists [replace them with typed arrays], etc.). > > Robert > > _______________________________________________ > Mono-devel-list mailing list > Mono-devel-list@lists.ximian.com > http://lists.ximian.com/mailman/listinfo/mono-devel-list _______________________________________________ Mono-devel-list mailing list Mono-devel-list@lists.ximian.com http://lists.ximian.com/mailman/listinfo/mono-devel-list