Hi, Atsushi. A few clarifications: * The milestones indeed come from olive/status/status.txt and then some of our own. We will develop this ection further next week. * XML Serialization - meaning using System.Xml.Serialization serializaer (supporting the XmlSerializerFormat attribute. * We tried to use NetTcpBinding but it didn't work for us. I can see that the code is so it's probably a small blocking issue. It'll be great if you can check that. * Using 'we' to mean Grasshopper is what happens when you consolidate several statuses into one place :-) We will clarify that part and clarify the Grassshopper specific issues. * As for the security status - this is actually from the olive/status/status.txt where we translated 'done' into supported. It'll actually be great if you could give better status on this since we still were not able to check any of this.
Eyal. -----Original Message----- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Atsushi Eno Sent: 28 March 2008 08:06 To: Miguel de Icaza; Noam Lampert Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]; mono-devel-list@lists.ximian.com Subject: Re: [Mono-dev] WCF and Mono Hello, For "milestones", we might want to rethink about it. The original plan was to achieve infocard capability, which is based on WS-Security and several security stack. Cardspace design is still nice, but looks like the security stack is not in our short milestone at least in Mainsoft and I sort of agree to their plan. Actually it is almost copy of my old olive/status/status.txt, so they had better overwrite it with their own :) Below are mostly for Mainsoft guys -- Instead of "Core Compare" section, we could just put a link to the latest olive build status such as http://mono.ximian.com/monobuild/builds/HEAD/suse-101-i586/olive/99113/f iles/steps/api-diff/ (I think there should be a convenient direct link to the class status page for the latest build; I'll ask Wade if it is possible). And the statistics miss other assemblies than System.ServiceModel.dll. As above, I wouldn't recommend adding them on our static wiki page though... The detailed analysis of the implementation status is *great*, especially on what we don't have today :-) There still seem some points that need correction, and some misleading lines I think: > > Serialization > > * XML Serialization - not supported > I'm not sure what this "XML Serialization" means; is there anything else than [Net]DataContractSerializer? > > Bindings > > * wsHttpBinding not supported. The only working binding is > basicHttpBinding. > How about TcpTransportBinding? (It is somewhat improved and should be sort of working now.) > > Proxy Generator > > This generator is a runtime generator for creating the proxy type. > Mono has an implementation that uses CodDom, which we can't use. Our > solution is probably will be based on Java Dynamic Proxies. > Are you talking about ClientProxyGenerator? AFAIR Mono.CodeGeneration is not based on CodeDom. (And yes, using "we" as Mainsoft on mono-project wiki is not appropriate ;-) > > SecurityBindingElement > > Binding Element > > > > Description > > > > Mono Status > > > > Relevant to GH > > AsymmetricSecurityBindingElement > > > > Supports public key encryption > > > > Implemented > > > > > > SymmetricSecurityBindingElement > > > > Supports shared key encryption > > > > Implemented > > > > > > TransportSecurityBindingElement > > > > Base class of security elements > > > > Implemented > > > I'm not sure what you means by "Implemented" here - they are WS-Security stuff that involves several missing WS-* functionality. That's all so far. Thanks for the nice status page :-) Atsushi Eno Miguel de Icaza wrote: > Hello folks, > > With Mono 2.0 approaching, it is time to start looking at new > areas in which Mono will expand. > > Noam at Mainsoft has updated the web page for the WCF project in > Mono with the information that they had put together at Mainsoft and > some of the information that was available as a status report inside > our "olive" module. > > If you are interested in WCF, please take a look at our WCF page > for details on milestones, goals, tasks and ways in which you can > contribute: > > http://www.mono-project.com/WCF > > Miguel > ------------------------------------------------------------------------ > > _______________________________________________ > Mono-devel-list mailing list > Mono-devel-list@lists.ximian.com > http://lists.ximian.com/mailman/listinfo/mono-devel-list > --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Mono Olive - developing 3.0, 3.5 and Silverlight" group. To post to this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/mono-olive?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~--- _______________________________________________ Mono-devel-list mailing list Mono-devel-list@lists.ximian.com http://lists.ximian.com/mailman/listinfo/mono-devel-list