Hi, On my amd64 machine, that method does get inlined. You can check the output of mono -v -v -v -v for INLINE lines to see what gets inlined.
Zoltan 2008/4/30 Alan McGovern <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > This method does not get inlined: > > private uint Ch (uint u, uint v, uint w) > { > return (u&v) ^ (~u&w); > } > > If that isn't inlined then don't ask me what kind of method *could* be > inlined by the JIT. > > Alan. > > > > On Wed, Apr 30, 2008 at 11:32 PM, Rodrigo Kumpera <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Mono only inline very short methods. Right now methods must have a body at > most 20 bytes long. > > > > > > > > > > 2008/4/30 Alan McGovern <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > > > > > > > > > > > > > > I recently started doing a bit of optimisation work on the > hashing/cryptography classes in mono. When working on the managed SHA256 > class[1], i noticed that mono isn't inlining what i'd consider some *very* > simple methods. > > > > > > The helper methods which do the bitshifting (Ro0, Ro1, Ch, Maj etc) > aren't inlined! Each of these methods is only called once in the code. By > manually inlining those method calls, performance increased significantly - > about 70%. Why isn't mono inlining these methods? Can mono be made inline > these? > > > > > > Alan. > > > > > > > [1]http://anonsvn.mono-project.com/viewcvs/trunk/mcs/class/corlib/System.Security.Cryptography/SHA256Managed.cs?rev=46462&view=markup > > > > > > _______________________________________________ > > > Mono-devel-list mailing list > > > Mono-devel-list@lists.ximian.com > > > http://lists.ximian.com/mailman/listinfo/mono-devel-list > > > > > > > > > > > > > _______________________________________________ > Mono-devel-list mailing list > Mono-devel-list@lists.ximian.com > http://lists.ximian.com/mailman/listinfo/mono-devel-list > > _______________________________________________ Mono-devel-list mailing list Mono-devel-list@lists.ximian.com http://lists.ximian.com/mailman/listinfo/mono-devel-list