Miguel de Icaza wrote: >> How to do 2) properly then? Should we simply move those assemblies to >> mcs, and develop there, or continue to develop in olive, and merge >> changes when we feel confident into mcs? I'd rather simply move them, >> but then we would have unstable assemblies in mcs. Should we apply the >> same policy we apply for Cecil, that is not exposing it to the >> compiler without using a pkg? > > Lets move the assemblies into mcs. There are plenty of pros and cons > to various other approaches (like stabilizing Olive and depending on it) > but it will be cumbersome and will add another dependency.
We were discussing about a similar issue inside the UIA team. Can we then take a similar approach for our assemblies in olive when our release dates arrive? Andrés -- _______________________________________________ Mono-devel-list mailing list Mono-devel-list@lists.ximian.com http://lists.ximian.com/mailman/listinfo/mono-devel-list