Hey Mike, I think it would be ok to use an environment variable for both 1.0 and 2.0 profiles.
Gert -----Original Message----- From: mono-devel-list-boun...@lists.ximian.com [mailto:mono-devel-list-boun...@lists.ximian.com] On Behalf Of Michael Barker Sent: zaterdag 13 december 2008 20:16 To: Mono Development List Subject: Re: [Mono-dev] [PATCH] System.Messaging/AMQP: Receive, Send and Peek implementation On Sun, Dec 14, 2008 at 12:05 AM, Michael Barker <m...@middlesoft.co.uk> wrote: >> System.Configuration.dll is only within 2.0, though I wouldn't care >> much for dropping 1.x support. We could alternatively use environment >> variable (we use it for registry and eventlogs for example). > > I would definitely prefer to drop 1.1 support. The 2.0 language > features, and not having to clutter the code with #ifdefs for the 2.0 > only features will make the implementation much cleaner. If there are > no objections I will move forward with a 2.0 only implementation. I've had a go at making System.Messaging 2.0 only, but there appears to be 1.1 libraries that depend on it. I think doing this will break to many other libraries, so I am going to use an environment variable for 1.1 and System.Configuration for 2.0. Mike. _______________________________________________ Mono-devel-list mailing list Mono-devel-list@lists.ximian.com http://lists.ximian.com/mailman/listinfo/mono-devel-list Internal Virus Database is out of date. Checked by AVG - http://www.avg.com Version: 8.0.175 / Virus Database: 270.9.15/1838 - Release Date: 12/8/2008 6:16 PM _______________________________________________ Mono-devel-list mailing list Mono-devel-list@lists.ximian.com http://lists.ximian.com/mailman/listinfo/mono-devel-list
