Hello Michael, Ugh, OK it does not seem to be quite simple as I originally guessed as Mono.Messaging was interface based. But this would be better, so please commit this change. Thanks.
(Sorry I'm in off mode and my replies will be belated.) Atsushi Eno Michael Barker wrote: > On Sun, Dec 21, 2008 at 7:02 AM, Michael Barker <m...@middlesoft.co.uk> wrote: >>> Thanks :) Though I have one request; they had better be made as virtual >>> in Mono.Messaging so that 1) those who derive from the driver do not >>> have to implement them by default, while 2) they can be implemented >>> in each driver's custom code. This change needs some coding work at >>> your side though :| >> Yes, good call. The change should be fairly mechanical. >> >> Mike. >> > > Not quite a simple as I thought, and I also forgot about implementing > the PeekCompleted/ReceiveCompleted events. Here is a new set of > patches. > > Please review. > > Mike. > > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------ > > _______________________________________________ > Mono-devel-list mailing list > Mono-devel-list@lists.ximian.com > http://lists.ximian.com/mailman/listinfo/mono-devel-list _______________________________________________ Mono-devel-list mailing list Mono-devel-list@lists.ximian.com http://lists.ximian.com/mailman/listinfo/mono-devel-list
