Nope...same results with a mscorlib.dll from the 1.0 folder. It gets stuck in the mono_local_regalloc method on the assert checking for ins->sreg != -1... Exactly the same message as before. It is trying to compile the Equals method
The inst op code is 633 and both sreg1 and sreg2 is -1.. . I am running the system with build 125709 and compiling the mscorlib.dll from the 1.0 folder... mobbe wrote: > > I am indeed trying to compile a 2.0 version of the mscorlib. I will grab > the 1.0 version instead and see if I have better luck with that one...if I > can get that to work then I will migrate to use the code from SVN and try > with the 2.0 profile. > > Thanks, > > > Zoltan Varga wrote: >> >> Hi, >> >> You might be trying to use full-aot with the 2.0 profile. Currently, >> only the 1.0 mscorlib can >> be full-aot-ed, altough 2.0 should work when using mono SVN. >> >> Zoltan >> >> On Mon, Feb 16, 2009 at 3:48 PM, mobbe <peter.mob...@gmail.com> wrote: >>> >>> I compiled the Mono framework (the unmanaged pieces) so that I could run >>> it >>> on my iPhone. I was successful in doing that and thought that I would >>> try to >>> do AOT on the iPhone...transfer the temporary asm output to my Mac to >>> assemble and link it and from there keep going... however when >>> performing >>> the AOT compilation of mscorlib.dll Mono hit another assert... something >>> with inst->sreg1 being negative 1 (-1) (Don't remember right now what >>> funtion it stopped in..will have to supply that information when I get >>> to my >>> Mac later tonight). >>> >>> If I commented out the assert it went on a bit further but stopped on a >>> another assert when trying to emit the op-code saying that it was >>> expecting >>> 0 bytes for the op-code ld_loadmembase but got 4... >>> >>> Anyone out there have an ideas of where I should be looking next in >>> order to >>> try to solve this? It seems like the instruction set it is using for ARM >>> doesn't match the source codes assumptions. I am sure that I am doing >>> something wrong but don't know where to begin to look for the issue. >>> Maybe >>> someone out there has a cpu-arm.h file that they know works that I can >>> compare with mine? Are there any other generated files regarding the >>> instruction set that I should double check? >>> >>> Thanks for your help in advance. >>> >>> >>> >>> Hi, >>> >>> full-aot currently only works on amd64/arm. >>> >>> Zoltan >>> >>> >>> -- >>> View this message in context: >>> http://www.nabble.com/On-what-platform%7Ccpu-arch%7Cmono-version-does-full-AOT-actually-work--tp21988583p22038601.html >>> Sent from the Mono - Dev mailing list archive at Nabble.com. >>> >>> _______________________________________________ >>> Mono-devel-list mailing list >>> Mono-devel-list@lists.ximian.com >>> http://lists.ximian.com/mailman/listinfo/mono-devel-list >>> >> _______________________________________________ >> Mono-devel-list mailing list >> Mono-devel-list@lists.ximian.com >> http://lists.ximian.com/mailman/listinfo/mono-devel-list >> >> > > -- View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/On-what-platform%7Ccpu-arch%7Cmono-version-does-full-AOT-actually-work--tp21988583p22049003.html Sent from the Mono - Dev mailing list archive at Nabble.com. _______________________________________________ Mono-devel-list mailing list Mono-devel-list@lists.ximian.com http://lists.ximian.com/mailman/listinfo/mono-devel-list