I saw that one, but that's two different subjects. I'm not speaking about binary serialization or internal implementation, but about the public API that classes should expose. Today the public API of the DateTime class does not match .NET one (and bug 325067 is rather about how it works internally).
So DateTime could implement ISerializable the way it wants (either to solve the bug mentioned or even by doing nothing special to match current behavior), but it should implement it, no? Robert Jordan wrote: > > Zacman wrote: >> Hi, >> >> MS .NET implementation of DateTime implements ISerializable, and not >> Mono. >> Is it a bug? I didn't find anything in the forum regarding it. Should I >> open >> a case in the bugtracker? > > https://bugzilla.novell.com/show_bug.cgi?id=325067 > > Robert > > _______________________________________________ > Mono-devel-list mailing list > [email protected] > http://lists.ximian.com/mailman/listinfo/mono-devel-list > > -- View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/Mono%27s-DateTime-not-implement-same-interfaces-as-.NET-tp23175058p23193823.html Sent from the Mono - Dev mailing list archive at Nabble.com. _______________________________________________ Mono-devel-list mailing list [email protected] http://lists.ximian.com/mailman/listinfo/mono-devel-list
