Very interesting Christian. Wouldn't it be worth to have it available as a compilation switch or something? Maybe performance varies depending on the test. I'm thinking on our own load tests.
pablo Christian Hergert wrote: > I've tested it in the past (extensibly during 2.4 cycle) with negligible > changes in performance on 2, 4, and 8 core boxes. > > -- Christian > > On Oct 13, 2009, at 2:10 PM, Zoltan Varga wrote: > >> Hi, >> >> We use malloc for allocating runtime memory structures etc., but in >> a server app, that >> all happens during startup, so it doesn't help much. >> >> Zoltan >> >> On Tue, Oct 13, 2009 at 11:05 PM, [email protected] >> <[email protected]> wrote: >> Hi there, >> >> Dick and I were talking about it today and most likely it wouldn't have >> a big impact since Mono does use mmap instead but.. do you guys think >> using tcmalloc would be worth? >> >> http://goog-perftools.sourceforge.net/doc/tcmalloc.html >> >> It's not new, but I've just found it reading the MySql 5.4 release >> notes, and it seems it helps boosting its performance >> >> http://mysqlha.blogspot.com/2009/01/double-sysbench-throughput-with_18.html >> >> >> Would it help? >> >> pablo >> _______________________________________________ >> Mono-devel-list mailing list >> [email protected] >> http://lists.ximian.com/mailman/listinfo/mono-devel-list >> >> _______________________________________________ >> Mono-devel-list mailing list >> [email protected] >> http://lists.ximian.com/mailman/listinfo/mono-devel-list > > _______________________________________________ Mono-devel-list mailing list [email protected] http://lists.ximian.com/mailman/listinfo/mono-devel-list
