Hello, > Are you talking about System.IO.MemoryStream? > Then imho this would be a problematic move. > Most people are used to new MemoryStream (someByteArray) being O(0) time, > but with ChunkedStream would be O(n). In fact in those cases ChunkedStream > would need twice the memory because it would still need to retain the > original byte array (e.g. for GetBuffer).
I dont think it would be O(n), there is a dereference only. > > Happy hacking > Andreas > > -----Ursprüngliche Nachricht----- > Von: mono-devel-list-boun...@lists.ximian.com > [mailto:mono-devel-list-boun...@lists.ximian.com] Im Auftrag von Miguel de > Icaza > Gesendet: Montag, 9. November 2009 19:10 > An: mono-devel-list > Betreff: [Mono-dev] Should we replace MemoryStream? > > Hello folks, > > I just blogged about a memory fragmentation issue here: > > http://tirania.org/blog/archive/2009/Nov-09.html > > And I am wondering: since MemoryStream is one of these sources of > problems, we could replace this implementation with MindTouch's > ChunkedStream. > > Miguel. > > _______________________________________________ > Mono-devel-list mailing list > Mono-devel-list@lists.ximian.com > http://lists.ximian.com/mailman/listinfo/mono-devel-list > _______________________________________________ Mono-devel-list mailing list Mono-devel-list@lists.ximian.com http://lists.ximian.com/mailman/listinfo/mono-devel-list
