In general, when you see NotImplementedException, it is not implemented yet i.e. you cannot use it in mono.
"It" here means ClientCredentialsElement and clientCredentials configuration element. Atsushi Eno On 2010/05/25 22:27, Greg Robinson wrote: > I changed the config file settings to basicHttpBinding, removed all of > the related WSHttpBinding values and ran under Mono 2.6+. > > Now I receive this exception > > System.NotImplementedException: The requested feature is not implemented. > at > System.ServiceModel.Configuration.ClientCredentialsElement.CreateBehavior > () [0x00000] in <filename unknown>:0 > > > > On Mon, May 24, 2010 at 2:25 PM, Atsushi Eno > <atsushi...@veritas-vos-liberabit.com > <mailto:atsushi...@veritas-vos-liberabit.com>> wrote: > > It should in general work (we use its client side in moonlight > too), depends on which parts of the features you use. > > Atsushi Eno > > > On 2010/05/24 23:09, Greg Robinson wrote: > > What about BasicHttpBinding? > > > > > > On Mon, May 24, 2010 at 10:00 AM, Atsushi Eno > <atsushi...@veritas-vos-liberabit.com > <mailto:atsushi...@veritas-vos-liberabit.com> > <mailto:atsushi...@veritas-vos-liberabit.com > <mailto:atsushi...@veritas-vos-liberabit.com>>> wrote: > > WSHttpBinding is not usable at all. It involves the huge WS-* > stack like WS-Security which is far from done. > > Atsushi Eno > > > On 2010/05/24 21:42, Greg Robinson wrote: > > I have been making good progress on moving our .NET server > application over to Mono 2.2 running on Ubuntu 2.2. > > Friday, I ported the WCF pieces over where all the server > application does is make calls to a WCF service running > on a > windows server outside of our office. > > I am getting the following, which suggests to me these > pieces > of "client side" WCF are not implemented in Mono 2.2: > > System.NotImplementedException: The requested feature > is not > implemented. > at > > > System.ServiceModel.Configuration.WSHttpBindingElement.OnApplyConfiguration > (System.ServiceModel.Channels.Binding binding) [0x00000] > at > > > System.ServiceModel.Configuration.StandardBindingElement.ApplyConfiguration > (System.ServiceModel.Channels.Binding binding) [0x00000] > at > System.ServiceModel.Configuration.ConfigUtil.CreateBinding > (System.String binding, System.String bindingConfiguration) > [0x00000] > at System.ServiceModel.ChannelFactory.ApplyConfiguration > (System.String endpointConfig) [0x00000] > at System.ServiceModel.ChannelFactory.InitializeEndpoint > (System.String endpointConfigurationName, > System.ServiceModel.EndpointAddress remoteAddress) > [0x00000] > at > > > System.ServiceModel.ChannelFactory`1[OurCompanyName.Common.WebServiceReference.OurCompanyNameWCFServiceProxy.IOurCompanyNameService]..ctor > (System.String endpointConfigurationName, > System.ServiceModel.EndpointAddress remoteAddress) > [0x00000] > at System.ServiceModel.ClientBase`1[TChannel].Initialize > (System.ServiceModel.InstanceContext instance, > System.String > configName, System.ServiceModel.EndpointAddress > remoteAddress) > [0x00000] > at System.ServiceModel.ClientBase`1[TChannel]..ctor > (System.ServiceModel.InstanceContext instance, > System.String > configname) [0x00000] > at System.ServiceModel.ClientBase`1[TChannel]..ctor > (System.ServiceModel.InstanceContext instance) [0x00000] > at System.ServiceModel.ClientBase`1[TChannel]..ctor () > [0x00000] > at > > > OurCompanyName.Common.WebServiceReference.OurCompanyNameWCFServiceProxy.OurCompanyNameServiceClient..ctor > () [0x00000] > at > > > OurCompanyName.Common.WebServiceReference.OurCompanyNameServiceProxyAgent.CreateServiceProxy > (Boolean useLimited) [0x00000] > at > > > OurCompanyName.Common.WebServiceReference.OurCompanyNameServiceProxyAgent.CreateServiceProxy > () [0x00000] > at > > > OurCompanyName.Common.WebServiceReference.OurCompanyNameServiceProxyAgent.GetConfiguration > (System.String loggerSAN) [0x00000] > at > > > OurCompanyName.Common.WebServiceReference.OurCompanyNameServiceProxyAgent.GetConfiguration > () [0x00000] > at OurCompanyNameWCFClientTest.Program.Main > (System.String[] > args) [0x00000] > > > > > Any idea if\when this will be implemented? is there a > workaround? > > > > > Thanks > > > > -- Greg > > My Blog: http://dotnetrocks.blogspot.com/ > My Techy Blog: http://weblogs.asp.net/grobinson/ > Amy's Blog: http://amyshome.blogspot.com/ > LinkedIn: http://www.linkedin.com/in/gregarobinson > > > _______________________________________________ > Mono-devel-list mailing list > Mono-devel-list@lists.ximian.com > <mailto:Mono-devel-list@lists.ximian.com> > <mailto:Mono-devel-list@lists.ximian.com > <mailto:Mono-devel-list@lists.ximian.com>> > > http://lists.ximian.com/mailman/listinfo/mono-devel-list > > > > > > -- > Greg > > My Blog: http://dotnetrocks.blogspot.com/ > My Techy Blog: http://weblogs.asp.net/grobinson/ > Amy's Blog: http://amyshome.blogspot.com/ > LinkedIn: http://www.linkedin.com/in/gregarobinson > My Company: > > http://www.richmondbizsense.com/2010/05/04/health-monitoring-company-is-well-aware-of-richmond%E2%80%99s-benefits/ > > > > > > > -- > Greg > > My Blog: http://dotnetrocks.blogspot.com/ > My Techy Blog: http://weblogs.asp.net/grobinson/ > Amy's Blog: http://amyshome.blogspot.com/ > LinkedIn: http://www.linkedin.com/in/gregarobinson > My Company: > http://www.richmondbizsense.com/2010/05/04/health-monitoring-company-is-well-aware-of-richmond%E2%80%99s-benefits/ _______________________________________________ Mono-devel-list mailing list Mono-devel-list@lists.ximian.com http://lists.ximian.com/mailman/listinfo/mono-devel-list
