On Wed, Jul 28, 2010 at 5:33 PM, Geoff Norton <gnor...@novell.com> wrote: > I'm not so sure I agree here, our commits by and large tend to be pretty > atomic. Thats not to say that it cannot have unintended consequences, but > you're going to need to understand the motivation behind the entire commit > to fix an unintended consequence regardless to ensure that you dont go and > break whatever the fix was for.
I agree. If you end up explaining two separate things in a commit message, it probably means the commit should be split. Mark _______________________________________________ Mono-devel-list mailing list Mono-devel-list@lists.ximian.com http://lists.ximian.com/mailman/listinfo/mono-devel-list
