It should run fine, as it's /probably/ doing what the cast to object is doing... But, of course, it violates type-safety so the compiler moans at you.
Like I suggested, if you cast to object, then cast to the delegate, this'll get round the compilation error. -- Spink On 20 December 2010 11:09, Federico Di Gregorio <f...@initd.org> wrote: > On 20/12/2010 11:11, Tom Spink wrote: >> You could propagate the abstract method type parameter out to the >> class definition: > > Unfortunately I can't have a generic abstract class because I need: > > Dictionary<Type,A> precompiledExpressionsByType; > > and then, in other parts of the library: > > X result = precompiledExpressionsByType[typeof(X)] > .evaluateSuchAndSuchExpr<X>(param1, param2, ...); > > where evaluateSuchAndSuchExpr() is a method of A (GetXXX in my previous > email). > > Anyway, thank you all for confirming this was a bug in my code[*]; I'll > fix it using a different approach. > > federico > > [*] In fact the code runs fine, even on MS.NET, when compiled with Mono 2.6. > > -- > Federico Di Gregorio f...@initd.org > Ubuntu is an ancient African word meaning "I can't configure Debian". > -- somewhere on IRC > -- Tom Spink _______________________________________________ Mono-devel-list mailing list Mono-devel-list@lists.ximian.com http://lists.ximian.com/mailman/listinfo/mono-devel-list
