I downloaded the source ball and built on my system so there is a lot of stuff there that is not needed by the runtime - I should think the whole mono-2.8 branch at minimum. I don't even see anything called xulrunner in the whole tree but did not build libgdiplus so it may have been there.
Also there are lots of 2.0, 3.5 and compat and doc directories and files, the include dir and more. The documentation that describes the assembly search order, that says all assemblies are in the GAC is wrong then if other directories are needed to find needed assemblies to run your program besides the GAC dir. Hate to be a pain on this but it seems the hierarchy created by make and install could be reorganized much better to be able to zip up what was needed for a runtime for a particular .NET release even if the whole framework and not pared down minus web and GUI stuff which I don't need. In Windows the assemblies are under a version dir and in mono the assembly versions are under a common dir by assembly type though maybe there is a good reason for that which I don't know. My .02 anyway and can't imagine I'm the only one that would like to more easily put the runtime on a machine without all the source, doc and other stuff in the 1.2G total tree. Thanks, Dave -- View this message in context: http://mono.1490590.n4.nabble.com/What-directories-files-needed-to-distribute-a-mono-runtime-from-a-build-tp3165696p3166171.html Sent from the Mono - Dev mailing list archive at Nabble.com. _______________________________________________ Mono-devel-list mailing list Mono-devel-list@lists.ximian.com http://lists.ximian.com/mailman/listinfo/mono-devel-list
