Zoltan,

I've rebased from mono's master branch and fixed all merge conflicts, but
something that's gone in since I first forked has now broken NaCl AOT
compilation for me.  On amd64 the compiler just crashes and I'm looking into
that, nut on x86 I'm getting this: Can't use AOT image 'mscorlib' in
aot-only mode because it is not compiled with --aot=full. But I'm compiling
with --aot=full,static,nodebug,ntrampolines=4096

If need be I can pick through the AOT changes that have gone in, but I was
hoping you or someone on this list would be able to tell me the major
changes to AOT from the past 3 weeks and some ideas about what might be
getting in my way.  Can you shed any light?

-Elijah



On Wed, Jan 5, 2011 at 3:51 PM, Zoltan Varga <var...@gmail.com> wrote:

> Hi,
>
>   I think the current code looks ok, and we should think about how to merge
> it into mono trunk. As a first step, could you rebase your master branch on
> top of master to fix the few conflicts which has surfaced due to changes to
> mono master ?
>
>                  Zoltan
>
> On Wed, Jan 5, 2011 at 8:23 PM, Elijah Taylor <elijahtay...@google.com>wrote:
>
>> Hi Zoltan,
>>
>> I've addressed all of the issues you pointed out (minus genmdesc.c:
>> __nacl_suspend_thread_if_needed, but that doesn't need to be merged in at
>> this time, it can remain in my local repository only).  Please take another
>> look at your earliest convenience and let me know if there's anything else
>> you need from me.
>>
>> -Elijah
>>
>>
>> On Tue, Jan 4, 2011 at 10:55 AM, Elijah Taylor 
>> <elijahtay...@google.com>wrote:
>>
>>> Replies inline:
>>>
>>> On Tue, Jan 4, 2011 at 10:30 AM, Zoltan Varga <var...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>
>>>> Hi,
>>>>
>>>>   Some comments:
>>>> - the patch changes IMT_REG to AMD64_R11 in the non-nacl case, I'm not
>>>> sure thats
>>>>   intentional.
>>>>
>>>
>>> Has this changed in the last six months on the Mono side?  IIRC I didn't
>>> mean to change anything like this.  The reason I made explicit defines was
>>> so code in aot-compiler and mini-amd64 could share defines over which reg
>>> was the one we jump through and which was a scratch reg.  I'll diff vs Mono
>>> head revision and make it correct.
>>>
>>>
>>>> - you could define __mono_ilp32__ in the nacl/amd64 case, and use that
>>>> instead of
>>>>   defined(__native_client_codegen__) && defined(TARGET_AMD64) in a few
>>>> places.
>>>>
>>>
>>> That sounds reasonable.  I'm assuming you mean non-arch specific areas
>>> like mini.c, aot-*.c, method-to-ir.c, etc?  Are there any other major
>>> consequences to defining __mono_ilp32__ ?
>>>
>>>
>>>> - it would be better to define nacl_global_codeman_validate () as a
>>>> no-op in the non-nacl case, so its callers wouldn't need #ifdefs.
>>>>
>>>
>>> I'll fix this.
>>>
>>>
>>>> - genmdesc.c contains this change, which is probably not needed:
>>>> +void __nacl_suspend_thread_if_needed() {}
>>>> +
>>>>
>>>
>>> It is needed temporarily due to a preliminary GC implementation, we don't
>>> have to submit it this way.  Eventually (soon) we won't need it at all.
>>>
>>>
>>>> - you could use sizeof(mgreg_t) instead of SIZEOF_REGISTER to be
>>>> consistent with
>>>>   the usage of sizeof(gpointer).
>>>>
>>>
>>> Sounds good.  I'll try to use sizeof for all compiled code and only use
>>> SIZEOF_REGISTER/SIZEOF_VOID_P for pre-processor directives only.
>>>
>>>
>>>> Other than these, I think the changes look fine, they aren't that
>>>> disruptive, since they don't
>>>> change the non-nacl behavior at all.
>>>>
>>>>
>>> Great!  I was worried just based on LOC changed that it might get more
>>> resistance.  In truth I'm more worried about future Mono changes
>>> accidentally breaking NaCl behavior.  I'm planning on getting some automated
>>> testing implemented soon to combat this though.
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>> On Tue, Dec 21, 2010 at 9:12 PM, Elijah Taylor <elijahtay...@google.com
>>>> > wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> Greetings Mono developers!
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> *[tl;dr  very large patch for Native 
>>>>> Client<http://www.chromium.org/nativeclient> support
>>>>> hosted here <https://github.com/elijahtaylor/mono>, would love
>>>>> feedback and many eyes to look at it]
>>>>> *
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> I'm back with another round of changes for supporting Google's Native
>>>>> Client (NaCl), including support for amd64, JIT compilation, and Garbage
>>>>> Collection.  It's a large set of changes, forked on Dec 14 in github @
>>>>> https://github.com/elijahtaylor/mono.  I would appreciate feedback on
>>>>> these changes... to facilitate this, I'll try to explain the largest 
>>>>> changes
>>>>> by feature (please email if clarification is needed):
>>>>>
>>>>> *1) amd64 codegen*
>>>>>
>>>>>    - Rules located here:
>>>>>    
>>>>> http://www.chromium.org/nativeclient/design-documents/nacl-sfi-model-on-x86-64-systems
>>>>>       - Removed %r15 from register allocation, LMF save/restore, etc.
>>>>>        (r15 is special and not modifiable by untrusted code)
>>>>>       - Sandbox all data access through membase address mode.  If not
>>>>>       %rsp or %rbp relative, re-write as clearing upper 32-bits + memindex
>>>>>       addressing
>>>>>       - align functions, call sites
>>>>>       - Sandbox returns and all indirect jumps (need to be 32-byte
>>>>>       aligned, cleared upper 32-bits)
>>>>>       - Never omit frame pointer as general operations to rbp aren't
>>>>>       allowed
>>>>>
>>>>> *2) NaCl x86-64 is ILP32 (this is the largest set of changes and may
>>>>> make some mono devs unhappy)*
>>>>>
>>>>>    - Set SIZEOF_REGISTER == 8 while sizeof(gpointer) == 4 for NaCl
>>>>>    amd64 (we can use 8-byte instructions, but pointers are 4-bytes)
>>>>>    - Re-write large portions of mini-amd64.c, tramp-amd64.c,
>>>>>    exceptions-amd64.c, mini.c, method-to-ir.c to use appropriate sizes
>>>>>    (SIZEOF_REGISTER, sizeof(gpointer), literal '8').  *These changes
>>>>>    are disruptive, but ultimately they should be more correct than what 
>>>>> was
>>>>>    there before.  *It's our opinion that these changes actually
>>>>>    improve Mono despite their impact.
>>>>>    - We only generate NaCl amd64 code from an ILP32 machine (either a
>>>>>    32-bit application for AOT code, or NaCl runtime JIT), so we may not 
>>>>> have
>>>>>    caught all of the [8 <--> SIZEOF_REGISTER] conversions, but we likely 
>>>>> caught
>>>>>    most of the [sizeof(gpointer) <--> SIZEOF_REGISTER] and [8 <-->
>>>>>    sizeof(gpointer)] changes that are necessary.
>>>>>    - Change atomic operations and default pointer directives to use
>>>>>    32-bit instructions (long instead of quad)
>>>>>    - Change default operations to use 32-bit integers/pointers (eg,
>>>>>    OP_LOAD_MEMBASE uses 4-bytes instead of 8)
>>>>>
>>>>> *3) JIT support for NaCl*
>>>>>
>>>>>    - Since we're unable to emit code directly in its final executable
>>>>>    location, we instead:
>>>>>       - reserve a buffer on the heap
>>>>>       - create a hash table entry mapping the temp location and final
>>>>>       location
>>>>>       - modify all non-local patches relative to the final location
>>>>>       - request the NaCl runtime to install the created code in the
>>>>>       final location
>>>>>    - See mono/utils/mono-codeman.c changes for more detail.
>>>>>    - For every codeman *reserve*, we must add a codeman *validate*call in 
>>>>> order to install the method/trampoline/blob in the final location
>>>>>    (as well as validate it for NaCl, pad it out, etc)
>>>>>    - We don't delete or reuse code  (we can, but it's icky and the
>>>>>    benefits don't outweigh the cost)
>>>>>    - Backpatching changed to use NaCl syscalls to modify existing
>>>>>    dynamic code
>>>>>
>>>>> *4) GC support for NaCl (boehm only)*
>>>>>
>>>>>    - NaCl compiler and Mono code generator both emit instrumentation
>>>>>    at GC "safe points" (back branches and function prologs), for 
>>>>> cooperative
>>>>>    thread parking (we're not allowed to send and receive signals)
>>>>>    - Added new opcode OP_NACL_GC_SAFE_POINT to handle mono
>>>>>    instrumentation
>>>>>    - modified pthread_stop_world.c and pthread_support.c somewhat
>>>>>    extensively to support this new way of stopping the world
>>>>>    - wrapped pthread_exit because NaCl doesn't support pthread cleanup
>>>>>    functions
>>>>>    - added machine type NACL to libgc with machine specific defines
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> *5) Misc bug fixes (not NaCl-specific)*
>>>>>
>>>>>    - fix *x86_memindex_emit* when disp is 32-bit
>>>>>    - properly exclude code in libgc/gc_dlopen.c when DYNAMIC_LOADING
>>>>>    not defined
>>>>>    - properly exclude code based on DISABLE_SOCKETS by including
>>>>>    config.h before checking define
>>>>>    - clean up calculation of offset for amd64 AOT specific trampoline
>>>>>    args
>>>>>    - fix bug in *mono_bblock_insert_before_ins* when trying to insert
>>>>>    an instruction to the beginning of an existing basic block.
>>>>>    - fix small typo bug in genmdesc.pl which kept amd64 from being
>>>>>    able to be a target of cross compiling
>>>>>    - fix struct passing in amd64 with sizeof(struct) == 16 when fields
>>>>>    aren't 8-byte aligned (eg, first field is 12 bytes, second field is 4
>>>>>    bytes), pass on stack instead of in registers (mini-amd64.c:*
>>>>>    add_valuetype*)
>>>>>    - add extra checks to mini-amd64.c:*mono_arch_emit_exceptions* to
>>>>>    keep exception/R4/R8 emitting from overflowing a buffer silently
>>>>>    - fix bugs in *new_codechunk* and 
>>>>> *mono_code_manager_reserve_align*which allowed unaligned code to be 
>>>>> allocated.
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> I know we're close to holidays so I don't have any delusions that these
>>>>> changes will get in by the end of the year :)  Please feel free to pick
>>>>> apart these changes and let me know if there are things that should be
>>>>> changed.
>>>>>
>>>>> -Elijah
>>>>>
>>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>>> Mono-devel-list mailing list
>>>>> Mono-devel-list@lists.ximian.com
>>>>> http://lists.ximian.com/mailman/listinfo/mono-devel-list
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>
>>
>
_______________________________________________
Mono-devel-list mailing list
Mono-devel-list@lists.ximian.com
http://lists.ximian.com/mailman/listinfo/mono-devel-list

Reply via email to