Hi Martin, On 27.01.2011 18:15, Martin Däumler wrote: > Hello Robert, > > thank you for your answer! > > On 24.01.2011 18:08, Robert Jordan wrote: > >> You may want to look at how Mono is handling those >> wrappers with its full-AOT subsystem. > > Actually, my pre-compilation code bases on the Full-AOT > code of Mono 2.6.1. Particularly, it uses code of > 'collect_methods()' and 'add_wrappers()'. Instead > of calling 'add_method()' in order to add a chosen > method to the AOT-compile structure, my pre-compilation > code calls 'mono_compile_method()' in order to pre-compile > the method. Quite simple. However, the signature sharing > seems to work not properly for my purposes. In > 'mono_marshal_get_runtime_invoke()' the 'runtime_invoke_cache' > returns one wrapper for different call signature, e.g., > for 'System.Threading.WaitHandle:set_Handle()' and > 'System.Attribute:System.Runtime.InteropServices._Attribute.GetTypeInfoCount()'.
Please check if your Mono tree is already containing this patch: https://github.com/mono/mono/commit/901a2d36f9b164ebbb5e4a9753cd817e4e5d26a1 I think w/out this patch, set_Handle(IntPtr) and GetTypeInfoCount(out uint) *might* share a signature. I'm not sure, though. Robert _______________________________________________ Mono-devel-list mailing list [email protected] http://lists.ximian.com/mailman/listinfo/mono-devel-list
