Thanks Andres. 

We build out of the mono-2-10 branch directly (no tags).

The part that is puzzling to me is why monoeg_g_hash_table_lookup calls 
mono_magic_trampoline (it doesn't).  Also frame #12 looks very suspiciously 
close in value to the key parameter of monoeg_g_hash_table_lookup (they are 
0x30 apart).

#10 0x00000000004977cd in mono_magic_trampoline (regs=0x600311, code=0x600311 
"__icall_wrapper_", arg=0x5f, tramp=0x8 <Address 0x8 out of bounds>) at 
mini-trampolines.c:590
#11 0x0000000041d5116a in ?? ()
#12 0x00007fe15cd65158 in ?? ()
#13 0x00000000005e2d2b in monoeg_g_hash_table_lookup (hash=0x178c180, 
key=0x7fe15cd653e8) at ghashtable.c:280
#14 0x0000000041ff0290 in ?? ()
#15 0x0000000000000000 in ?? ()

Any pointers on how to proceed here would be appreciated. How do folks on the 
mono team debug stack corruption like this?

Thanks!
Bassam

-----Original Message-----
From: mono-devel-list-boun...@lists.ximian.com 
[mailto:mono-devel-list-boun...@lists.ximian.com] On Behalf Of Andres G. 
Aragoneses
Sent: Monday, September 12, 2011 9:57 AM
To: mono-devel-list@lists.ximian.com
Subject: Re: [Mono-dev] Native stack trace in mono-2-10

On 09/11/2011 09:42 AM, Bassam Tabbara wrote:
> Hello,
>
> We are seeing the following crash quite frequently on our test servers:
>
> #0 0x00007fe188725165 in raise () from /lib/libc.so.6
>
> #1 0x00007fe188727f70 in abort () from /lib/libc.so.6
>
> #2 0x0000000000493298 in mono_handle_native_sigsegv (signal=2086645120,
> ctx=<value optimized out>) at mini-exceptions.c:2245
>
> #3 0x00000000004e6c8d in mono_arch_handle_altstack_exception
> (sigctx=0x7fe18390fac0, fault_addr=<value optimized out>,
>
> stack_ovf=0) at exceptions-amd64.c:956
>
> #4 0x0000000000417704 in mono_sigsegv_signal_handler (_dummy=11,
> info=0x7fe18390fbf0, context=0x7fe18390fac0) at mini.c:5881
>
> #5 <signal handler called>
>
> #6 0x00007fe1887fbc0b in ?? () from /lib/libc.so.6
>
> #7 0x000000000041e751 in mono_jit_compile_method_with_opt
> (method=0x178c180, opt=51472895, ex=0x7fe15cd65040) at mini.c:5342
>
> #8 0x000000000041eefe in mono_jit_compile_method (method=0x600311) at
> mini.c:5403
>
> #9 0x0000000000496eaf in common_call_trampoline (regs=0x7fe15cd652f0,
> code=0x41ff0290 "\353", <incomplete sequence \344>,
>
> m=0x178c180, tramp=<value optimized out>, vt=0x0, vtable_slot=0x0,
> need_rgctx_tramp=0) at mini-trampolines.c:488
>
> #10 0x00000000004977cd in mono_magic_trampoline (regs=0x600311,
> code=0x600311 "__icall_wrapper_", arg=0x5f,
>
> tramp=0x8 <Address 0x8 out of bounds>) at mini-trampolines.c:590
>
> #11 0x0000000041d5116a in ?? ()
>
> #12 0x00007fe15cd65158 in ?? ()
>
> #13 0x00000000005e2d2b in monoeg_g_hash_table_lookup (hash=0x178c180,
> key=0x7fe15cd653e8) at ghashtable.c:280
>
> #14 0x0000000041ff0290 in ?? ()
>
> #15 0x0000000000000000 in ?? ()
>
> The servers is an x64 running Debian Linux 6.
>
> The back trace looks odd in that g_hash_table_lookup is calling a
> trampoline. Is this memory corruption? Any ideas on how to debug this?


Have you read http://www.mono-project.com/Gdb ?

Also, mono-2-10 is a branch, are you using the branch or particular 
tag/version? (I recall seeing a bug about trampolines and g_hash_tables 
being already fixed upstream a while ago.)

   Andres

-- 

_______________________________________________
Mono-devel-list mailing list
Mono-devel-list@lists.ximian.com
http://lists.ximian.com/mailman/listinfo/mono-devel-list
_______________________________________________
Mono-devel-list mailing list
Mono-devel-list@lists.ximian.com
http://lists.ximian.com/mailman/listinfo/mono-devel-list

Reply via email to