Hi Jonathan, If you're using trunk, Zoltan Varga added a mono_reflection_type_get_type to handle that.
On Tue, Dec 13, 2011 at 11:47 AM, Jonathan Shore <jonathan.sh...@gmail.com>wrote: > Thanks. That works > > > On Mon, Dec 12, 2011 at 7:01 PM, Rodrigo Kumpera <kump...@gmail.com>wrote: > >> There are two ways, you can do it from managed land directly: >> >> Type t = ...; >> return t.TypeHandle.Value; >> >> This will give you a MonoType* (which is easy to convert to a MonoClass*). >> >> The other option is pretty shitty, due to a silly limitation in mono's >> embedding API. >> What you do is fetch the _impl field using mono_field_get_value >> >> MonoType *type; >> mono_field_get_value (obj, _impl_field, &type); >> >> >> On Tue, Dec 13, 2011 at 12:50 AM, Jonathan Shore < >> jonathan.sh...@gmail.com> wrote: >> >>> I have a method call that returns System.Type. I want to make use of >>> the type and do some reflection from C++. Have code like this: >>> >>> MonoClass* klass = (MonoClass*)mono_runtime_invoke (...); >>> >>> >>> I am pretty sure that the casting to MonoClass* is not appropriate. >>> The mono_runtime_invoke() function returns aMonoObject*. How do I >>> coerce the MonoObject* containing a reference to Type to MonoClass*. I >>> want to be able to be able to call: >>> >>> mono_class_get_properties (type, &iter) >>> >>> >>> iteratively, later. >>> >>> FYI: I posted this on stackoverflow @ >>> http://stackoverflow.com/questions/8483406/coercing-monoobject-to-monoclass-where-a-method-call-returns-a-typeif >>> anyone cares to answer. >>> Thanks >>> >>> Jonathan >>> >>> _______________________________________________ >>> Mono-devel-list mailing list >>> Mono-devel-list@lists.ximian.com >>> http://lists.ximian.com/mailman/listinfo/mono-devel-list >>> >>> >> > > > -- > Jonathan Shore > http://tr8dr.wordpress.com/ >
_______________________________________________ Mono-devel-list mailing list Mono-devel-list@lists.ximian.com http://lists.ximian.com/mailman/listinfo/mono-devel-list
