> > I've answered to other question that "as GitHub already provides it > (compressed exports) on the tags page > (https://github.com/mono/mono/tags) it is not needed to do (source) > releases at > http://download.mono-project.com/sources/mono/.";
Have you tried compiling these Github exports? I don't think they work as expected, as they don't include submodules (so you need to download a bunch of dependencies manually). On Thu, Apr 18, 2013 at 9:45 PM, Rafael Teixeira <mono...@gmail.com> wrote: > Hi APS, > > I've answered to other question that "as GitHub already provides it > (compressed exports) on the tags page > (https://github.com/mono/mono/tags) it is not needed to do (source) > releases at > http://download.mono-project.com/sources/mono/."; > > From there you can see many tags (although some mis-versioning is present). > > Tags for the 3.0 series (which is installed with Xamarin Studio in > MacOSX) are available. For example, the latest seems to be > https://github.com/mono/mono/archive/mono-3.10.tar.gz that seems by > its date to be the version following 3.0.9. > > As for stability, I guess that tagged versions should be considered > reliable enough, but testing for what you need is the only way to be > sure... > > Hope it helps, > Rafael Teixeira > O..:.)oooo > > > On Thu, Apr 18, 2013 at 7:39 AM, APS <dev.ma...@apsystems.it> wrote: > > You're right, the patch has not been applied yet. I've to apply the > patch to > > my sources. > > Btw, how mono versions works? > > The last stable version, according to the website is 2.10.9, every other > > versions after that is supposed to be unstable, am I right? > > The last 2.1x version announced is 2.11.4. The 2.12 does not exists, it > has > > been renamed to 3.0? > > In one of his blog posts Miguel says that the trunk is merged only with > > working changes, so it should be less unstable than older unstable > versions. > > All these questions fall in the last one, for a production environment is > > safer to install 2.10.9, the last stable but without recent patches and, > > from today, with no more support or the 3.0.x, the beta version but fixed > > and checked? > > Sorry for these banal questions but I've to plan upgrades and I would > like > > to do the correct thing. > > > > > > At 18:24 17/04/2013, Rafael Teixeira wrote: > >> > >> The bug is not 'Closed', so probably the patch wasn't reviewed and > >> applied to sources, yet. > >> Rafael Teixeira > >> O..:.)oooo > >> > >> > >> On Wed, Apr 17, 2013 at 11:43 AM, APS <dev.ma...@apsystems.it> wrote: > >> > Hi, > >> > I have a doubt caused by my ignorance on how mono versions are > released. > >> > I installed the latest stable release, 2.10.9 from sources and I fell > >> > into > >> > the bug described here > https://bugzilla.xamarin.com/show_bug.cgi?id=3004 > >> > I don't know if it's better for me to apply the patch to my code or to > >> > install a later version. I saw non-documented versions like 2.11.x, > they > >> > are > >> > unstable? Abandoned? Why they are not listed between the versions > under > >> > download page? > >> > Thanks in advance for yout help. > >> > > >> > _______________________________________________ > >> > Mono-devel-list mailing list > >> > Mono-devel-list@lists.ximian.com > >> > http://lists.ximian.com/mailman/listinfo/mono-devel-list > >> > > >> > >> -- > >> Il messaggio e' stato analizzato alla ricerca di virus o > >> contenuti pericolosi da MailScanner, ed e' > >> risultato non infetto. > > > > > > _______________________________________________ > > Mono-devel-list mailing list > > Mono-devel-list@lists.ximian.com > > http://lists.ximian.com/mailman/listinfo/mono-devel-list > _______________________________________________ > Mono-devel-list mailing list > Mono-devel-list@lists.ximian.com > http://lists.ximian.com/mailman/listinfo/mono-devel-list >
_______________________________________________ Mono-devel-list mailing list Mono-devel-list@lists.ximian.com http://lists.ximian.com/mailman/listinfo/mono-devel-list
