Yeah, that was what I was doing.
 
I created these PRs:
https://github.com/mono/referencesource/pull/1
https://github.com/mono/mono/pull/1433 
-- Alex
 
From: mig...@xamarin.com
Date: Sat, 29 Nov 2014 11:23:01 -0500
Subject: Re: [Mono-dev] Porting System.Numerics from referencesource, 
approaches for copying code?
To: alex.koeplin...@outlook.com
CC: mono-devel-list@lists.ximian.com

I just realized it might not have been 100% clear what I think we should do.
We would in this case replace the references to our mono/mcs/class/XX/*/*cs 
source files, with the "../../external/referencesource/..." files, and then 
alter the original referencesource file with the #if statements.
We have done that already in a couple of places.
(More to come, last night we got XML working, but needs some work)
On Sat, Nov 29, 2014 at 11:21 AM, Miguel de Icaza <mig...@xamarin.com> wrote:
Thanks Alex.
I do not think that we will have a strict rule for when to copy and when to 
reference.  
There are scenarios where we will want to keep a lot of the code in one of our 
files, and pull code from the referencesource.   At that point, we will have to 
determine whether the use of #ifdefs or partial classes is a better long-term 
maintenance approach than copying the source.
In this particular case, I feel that we can modify the reference source, and 
add the #if MONO around it.
The reason is that the changes are pretty straight forward, it is mostly about 
disabling code, and not about picking some specific bits of code and putting 
them on our tree.   So an #if would be nice, since we can do a few things (a) 
we can later find out what code is being disabled by the port (looking at work 
we can do in the future to import new versions, or contribute back to .NET) and 
(b) the changes are minimal right now.
Miguel
On Sat, Nov 29, 2014 at 10:59 AM, Alexander Köplinger 
<alex.koeplin...@outlook.com> wrote:



Here's the diff between my trimmed version and the original: 
http://www.mergely.com/9E70e5Ls/
 
Hmm, I actually think that most of the removed methods don't matter (as they 
aren't called anyway). I just wanted to make the file only contain the code 
that is necessary.
The only "real" changes I had to make where accesses to internal fields in 
NumberFormatInfo, I just replaced them with accesses to the public properties 
that read them.

Maybe it makes more sense to correct those accesses directly in the 
referencesource, so we can reference it from there?
As a general guidance, when should we copy something to the Mono tree vs. 
editing referencesource? And if we copy, should we keep unneeded methods or 
remove them? 
 
-- Alex
 
From: mig...@xamarin.com
Date: Sat, 29 Nov 2014 10:40:10 -0500
Subject: Re: [Mono-dev] Porting System.Numerics from referencesource, 
approaches for copying code?
To: alex.koeplin...@outlook.com
CC: mono-devel-list@lists.ximian.com

Hey Alex,
In general, the approach works.
I am curious as to what is that you had to remove, and why.   Can you describe 
the needed changes?   (I saw the diff, but it is hard to tell what happened 
with it).
I thought that Numerics was pretty much standalone.
On Sat, Nov 29, 2014 at 10:32 AM, Alexander Köplinger 
<alex.koeplin...@outlook.com> wrote:



Hey, I've been trying to port System.Numerics (BigInteger, Complex classes) 
from referencesource to see and feel what the process looks like.
It mostly went fine, but there was one file (number.cs) I couldn't reference 
directly from the submodule and had to copy to the assembly folder in the Mono 
tree.
 
I had to remove a bunch of code from that file to trim it down to only what is 
needed for System.Numerics to compile (all the tests pass now as well).
Question: is this a valid approach or is there something better? Note that 
ifdefing the file wasn't feasible as it originally sits inside corlib and has 
many other unrelated methods in it.
 
Here's the commit with the WIP: 
https://github.com/akoeplinger/mono/commit/d7c461155a975a35f76b79ebcc3fe33407bd5dce
 
-- Alex
                                          

_______________________________________________

Mono-devel-list mailing list

Mono-devel-list@lists.ximian.com

http://lists.ximian.com/mailman/listinfo/mono-devel-list



                                          



                                          
_______________________________________________
Mono-devel-list mailing list
Mono-devel-list@lists.ximian.com
http://lists.ximian.com/mailman/listinfo/mono-devel-list

Reply via email to