Mono 3.x is missing many of the profiler improvements that have been made lately. I'd strongly advise upgrading to the latest 4.x if you plan to use it.
Which assumptions? Regards, Alex On Tue, Sep 15, 2015 at 5:38 PM, Greg Young <gregoryyou...@gmail.com> wrote: > Thanks for the update I will check out the recent changes. I have been > looking at 3.12.0 and have found some issues. Mostly I was curious if > I could rely on many of the assumptions that are being made in it. > > Cheers, > > Greg > > On Tue, Sep 15, 2015 at 6:37 PM, Alex Rønne Petersen <a...@alexrp.com> wrote: >> Yes, certainly. A lot of work has gone into it lately. It should be >> more reliable than ever. >> >> Regards, >> Alex >> >> On Sun, Sep 13, 2015 at 1:18 AM, Greg Young <gregoryyou...@gmail.com> wrote: >>> Is this supposed to be considered as working code at this point? >>> https://github.com/mono/mono/blob/master/mono/profiler/proflog.c >>> >>> -- >>> Studying for the Turing test >>> _______________________________________________ >>> Mono-devel-list mailing list >>> Mono-devel-list@lists.ximian.com >>> http://lists.ximian.com/mailman/listinfo/mono-devel-list > > > > -- > Studying for the Turing test _______________________________________________ Mono-devel-list mailing list Mono-devel-list@lists.ximian.com http://lists.ximian.com/mailman/listinfo/mono-devel-list
