On Wed, 2004-05-19 at 21:39, Robert Foster wrote: <snip/> > Actually, changing libgtkhtml-3.0.so.2 to libgtkhtml-3.0.so works, > provided that you have installed the gtkhtml3-devel package (which > installs a symlink from /usr/lib/libgtkhtml-3.0.so.4 to > /usr/lib/libgtkhtml-3.0.so). > Might make it a little easier for the maintainers?
In this case, "easier for maintainers" == "harder for users". We don't want to require the installation of development packages just to use an application. This is what we previously did, and it generated a number of complaints by people who didn't want to install 10's of MB of -devel packages just to run a little app.... I would argue that libgtkhtml-3 is broken. It's changed the major version number of the library (2 => 4). Such a change would break normal unmanaged applications, as the .so name would be different. This may be because libgtkhtml-3 doesn't promise any API/ABI stability guarantees, which is probably an even bigger issue. Compare this to libgtk-x11-2.0.so, which on RH9 is libgtk-x11-2.0.so.0.200.2, and on FC2 is libgtk-x11-2.0.so.0.400.0. They have the same major version number (0), so both managed and unmanaged programs won't break when upgrading. The solution is to dump libgtkhtml-3 and use something else. :-) Alas, this is a rather difficult solution, but long term I believe this is where Gnome is headed, as they're not keen on depending on three different HTML implementations (gtkhtml2 for yelp, Gecko for epiphany, and libgtkhtml3 for evolution). IIRC, long term is to migrate to Gecko, but I could be wrong... - Jon _______________________________________________ Mono-docs-list maillist - [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://lists.ximian.com/mailman/listinfo/mono-docs-list