Yep. And in reality, they aren't going to be making inroads against Java if they aggressively enforce any .NET patent (if they are even granted -- which IMO, is unlikely).
^Tum > -----Original Message----- > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:mono-list- > [EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of J. Perkins > Sent: Friday, 14 February 2003 1:43 a.m. > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Cc: Miguel de Icaza > Subject: Re: [Mono-list] someone, please clear out that patents issue > > I read a some of these discussions, but gave it up when it > became clear that most of the people had no idea what was > going on. Kudos to Miguel for staying the course and not > responding to the petty remarks directed at him. Mono is > a remarkable project...I will never go back to C++! > > FWIW, I was contacted by an MS employee -- I don't know > anything about his role or responsibilities -- about the > possibility of using wx.NET as a GUI library for Rotor. > So they are out there, watching, listening... ;) > > Jason > 379 > > > > Miguel de Icaza wrote: > > I personally did not want to get involved with the debate, because most > > of it was from miss-informed opinions. The original ZDnet article ahs a > > few quotes from people who looked at the caption and made a blank > > statement, so there is nothing really new in the discussion. > > > _______________________________________________ > Mono-list maillist - [EMAIL PROTECTED] > http://lists.ximian.com/mailman/listinfo/mono-list _______________________________________________ Mono-list maillist - [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://lists.ximian.com/mailman/listinfo/mono-list
