I get almost identical results overall on SciMark with AOT and JIT compilation. The overall results are 97.0 MFlops (JIT) versus 95.4 MFlops (AOT). Some subtests are faster with JIT; some are faster with AOT. This difference is less than what I see from week to week comparing JIT-to-JIT, as various components of the runtime change.
On Tuesday 13 April 2004 5:08 pm, Jonathan Pryor wrote: > AOT (or pre-JITing) assemblies is not as useful as you'd think. It has > two primary effects: > > - Reduce memory requirements, as memory doesn't need to be allocated > for the JITed code > - Decrease startup time, as (again) the JITing doesn't need to be > done. _______________________________________________ Mono-list maillist - [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://lists.ximian.com/mailman/listinfo/mono-list
