Hello, > > I don't know whether we want to limit intellisense to only working if > > Eclipse is running inside IKVM, though. A bridge to the CLR from a > > generic JVM using only JNI but providing the same capabilities as > > IKVM, compatibly, would be the holy grail ;) > > > > However you could run a process (read mono application) that the C# > plugin would communicate with and that would tell it what completions > are. This application could be built using some of the engine work in > MD (a GUI less MD engine).
Exactly, you would have to design an RPC mechanism and run the code out-of-proc. > > > (With regard to your main point, I don't think that anyone would > > dispute that getting the basic, minimum features working is a higher > > priority than the advanced flashy ones, but the question originally > > asked sounded a lot like "what features do you want?". It's > > unsurprising that the answers focused on advanced features. "I want it > > to *work*" is kind of implied...) > > Well, I wanted to make sure those requirements were clear (C# 1.0, > platforms, eclipse version and mono/mcs integration. > > Once we get that working, the community is likely to pick it up and > improve it (debugger, form designer, automatic ice cream machine) > > Erik > _______________________________________________ Mono-list maillist - [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://lists.ximian.com/mailman/listinfo/mono-list