-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 Jon Watte <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I believe that all three of these criteria will push this risk > to the bottom of the pile WRT mono task lists. That sounds reasonable; also I wouldn't object when someone says that there's nothing wrong with putting it on a "risks that we choose not to address" list. My objection was against a -clearly false- FUD statement of a Mono project leader about DotGNU having risks in this area. Also I would like to know what exactly the position of the Mono project leadership is concerning what security threats should be taken into consideration, so that I can make sure that I won't accidentally misrepresent their position. > But if you feel different, I think there's room to contribute ;-) I do feel different but I have been at the receiving end of so much hostility from Mono project leaders that now I'm very sure that I'm not interested in contributing to Mono, at least as long as these people are leading. Greetings, Norbert. - -- Founder & Steering Committee member of DotGNU, see http://dotgnu.org/ Free Software Business Strategy Guide ---> http://FreeStrategy.info Norbert Bollow, Weidlistr.18, CH-8624 Gruet (near Zurich, Switzerland) Tel +41 1 972 20 59 Fax +41 1 972 20 69 http://norbert.ch -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.2.4 (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQFA8sE4oYIVvXUl7DIRAj7CAJ9dRyG9WBL8LKn2AqVbQNFncDQ7ZACg3tcC PxBMFirDbxAx/T5U79NTX28= =gLER -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- _______________________________________________ Mono-list maillist - [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://lists.ximian.com/mailman/listinfo/mono-list