Hi Duncan! I've noticed some packaging errors for Fedora Core 1&2:
1. I downloaded mono-all.zip for Fedora Core 2 (for machine which had mono-1.0 installed): http://www.go-mono.com/archive/1.0.1/fedora-2-i386/mono-all.zip After unpacking I tried: [EMAIL PROTECTED] # rpm -Uhv *.rpm error: Failed dependencies: bytefx-data-mysql = 1.0.1-1.ximian.8.1 is needed by mono-complete-1.0.1-1.ximian.8.1 ibm-data-db2 = 1.0.1-1.ximian.8.1 is needed by mono-complete-1.0.1-1.ximian.8.1 The zip file doesn't contain the required components. I couldn't find them on the web page either. After I moved away mono-complete-1.0.1-1.ximian.8.1.i386.rpm the rpm upgrade of the remaining packages succeeded. 2. On another machine (Fedora Core 1 without mono) I downloaded the appropriate mono-all.zip and got: [EMAIL PROTECTED] mono-1.0.1]# rpm -Uhv *.rpm error: Failed dependencies: cairo >= 0.1.23-2 is needed by libgdiplus-1.0.1-1.ximian.7.1 bytefx-data-mysql = 1.0.1-1.ximian.7.1 is needed by mono-complete-1.0.1-1.ximian.7.1 ibm-data-db2 = 1.0.1-1.ximian.7.1 is needed by mono-complete-1.0.1-1.ximian.7.1 mono(atk-sharp) >= 1.0.0.0 is needed by monodoc-1.0.1-1.ximian.7.1 mono(gdk-sharp) >= 1.0.0.0 is needed by monodoc-1.0.1-1.ximian.7.1 mono(glade-sharp) >= 1.0.0.0 is needed by monodoc-1.0.1-1.ximian.7.1 mono(glib-sharp) >= 1.0.0.0 is needed by monodoc-1.0.1-1.ximian.7.1 mono(gtk-sharp) >= 1.0.0.0 is needed by monodoc-1.0.1-1.ximian.7.1 mono(gtkhtml-sharp) >= 1.0.0.0 is needed by monodoc-1.0.1-1.ximian.7.1 mono(pango-sharp) >= 1.0.0.0 is needed by monodoc-1.0.1-1.ximian.7.1 In addition to bytefx and db2 providers, the zip file doesn't contain GTK# required by monodoc. 3. I also attempted to install mod-mono, but looks like the apache component is missing: [EMAIL PROTECTED] mono-1.0.1]# rpm -qlp *.rpm | grep mod /usr/bin/mod-mono-server /usr/bin/mod-mono-server.exe /usr/share/doc/xsp/test/mod-mono-server.exe.config /usr/share/man/man1/mod-mono-server.1 Notice that there's a mod-mono-server.exe file but there's no matching apache module "mod_mono.so". Is there any RPM available which contains mod_mono.so ? 4. When you compare: http://mono2.ximian.com/archive/1.0/fedora-2-i386/ http://mono2.ximian.com/archive/1.0.1/fedora-2-i386/ You'll notice that many packages are missing in the 1.0.1 release. Is v1.0.1 supposed to be installed over 1.0.0 as an upgrade-only option? Jarek ----- Original Message ----- From: "Duncan Mak" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: "mono-list mailing list" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Cc: "mono-devel mailing list" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Thursday, August 05, 2004 2:59 AM Subject: [Mono-devel-list] Mono 1.0.1 released > Hello all, > > An update of the Mono 1.0 release is now available for testing. You can > find source tarballs and RPM packages for the 1.0.1 release here: > > http://go-mono.com/archive/1.0.1/ > > Please test the packages and tarballs and report any problems you find. > If all goes well, we'll do our final testing and announce the 1.0.1 > release to the public and update the web site tomorrow. > > Thank you, > > Duncan. > _______________________________________________ > Mono-devel-list mailing list > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > http://lists.ximian.com/mailman/listinfo/mono-devel-list > _______________________________________________ Mono-list maillist - [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://lists.ximian.com/mailman/listinfo/mono-list