On Thu, 2004-08-05 at 19:45, Todd Berman wrote: > > Why isnt is possible to create a 'mono' and 'mono-devel' package that is > basically a stub that deps on what would go in those. That way you get > the best of both worlds. >
We already have something similar, we have mono-complete and mono-complete-devel. The problem is that, removing mono-complete does not remove the packages that it depends on, as it is simply an empty (meta) package. Duncan. _______________________________________________ Mono-list maillist - [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://lists.ximian.com/mailman/listinfo/mono-list
