On Sun, 06 Feb 2005 13:18:55 -0500 Gonzalo Paniagua Javier wrote: > No need to add anything to the FAQ if we fix endianness detection even > on those systems.
IMHO it would be nice to also help people who grab mod_mono 1.0.5 (source) and apache-dev (pseudo-source :-) from some distribution CD. The FAQ looked like a good place since these people will probably google for "abnormal string size", and the FAQ is likely to show up at the top of the hitlist. >> >> Why is mod_mono_server implemented as a standalone server >> instead of baseing it on an embedded Mono runtime, which would >> also be much closer to the Apache plug-in architecture? Licensing >> issues? > > The first mod_mono by Daniel Ridruejo tried to do that and didn't > succeed. May be because of problems with the mono runtime (it was long > time ago) or whatnot. > Another reason is that you can have several different machines running > apache and forwarding asp.net requests to a single machine, thus not > losing any state information (if using InProc) and not losing the > precompiled/cached stuff. Thanks for the explanation, it answers my question. An embedded runtime could also be used to implement the inter-machine communication, but would probably be somewhat heavy-weight for that purpose compared to the current lean mod_mono shared lib. Winfried _______________________________________________ Mono-list maillist - Mono-list@lists.ximian.com http://lists.ximian.com/mailman/listinfo/mono-list
