> > Miguel - I've just read your blog entry [1]. Very interesting. > > Quote: "This patch is not very interesting anymore as ASP.NET 2.x > > allows for websites to be deployed by precompiling the > whole site and > > copying the resulting DLL." > > Of course all the old 1.x deploying techniques can be used in > 2.z. using inline code or using Visual Studio to create a > DLL, but the new ones may be better for developers because no > server side compilation needed and protects your source code as well. > > > I thought you could do this under ASP.NET 1.x? > > Of course 1.x can use DLLs but it creates classes in a DLL > that inherit from System.Web.UI.Page and that classes are > used as the base classes of the class created from the .aspx > file on the server. This means that you have to include your > .aspx file and it can be modified. You can modify HTML code, > server side controls and you can add inline code. > > In 2.x the new thing is that you can compile your .aspx files > into a DLL and the content of .aspx files cannot be seen on > the production server nor can it be extended.
Ah. I did wonder if that is what was meant. That sounds very powerful. > > There is a new tool called aspnet_compiler.exe: > http://msdn2.microsoft.com/library/ms178614(en-us,vs.80).aspx > > (I don't wanted to be technically correct and talk about all > features of ASP.NET I just tried to show the difference > regarding aspnet_compiler.exe) -- This message has been scanned for viruses and dangerous content by MailScanner, and is believed to be clean. _______________________________________________ Mono-list maillist - Mono-list@lists.ximian.com http://lists.ximian.com/mailman/listinfo/mono-list