Michal Moskal wrote:
On 1/13/06, Chad Robinson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
I'm confused. My understanding is that Dictionary is supposed to be much more
efficient here because it doesn't box and unbox. But, when I run the generic
version, it takes 4.18s to run on average, while the Hashtable version takes
2.54s to run. Despite the boxing, the Hashtable runs MUCH faster. This is
running with --optimize=all (doesn't seem to change anything either way).
Using custom IEqualityComparer helps a bit (see attached testecase).
Otherwise it is probably Dictionary implementation that is not as
optimized as the Hashtable.
It's the runtime. Mono's Dictionary implementation performs very well
under MS.NET 2.0 (about 70% of the performance of MS' implementation).
Robert
_______________________________________________
Mono-list maillist - Mono-list@lists.ximian.com
http://lists.ximian.com/mailman/listinfo/mono-list
