On Tue, Jun 23, 2009 at 7:11 PM, ignorator<the_ignora...@hotmail.com> wrote: > >> Just to add some clarification in addition to Robert's response: this >> is only required if you are embedding the Mono runtime in your >> application. If you are writing a managed application using Mono then >> this clause does not apply. > > Thank you for your answers. So as far as I understan a usage similar to > Unity3D would require a commercial license?
I assume that the PC/Mac versions of the Unity runtime *dynamically* link Mono, so end-users can replace the Mono library that Unity uses. Since this would comply with the terms of the LGPL, it would *not* require a commercial license. This clearly isn't possible with the Unity Wii and iPhone ports, so those versions have a commercial Mono license. I'm not a lawyer, so if you need legal advice regarding the LGPL you should find a lawyer :) -- Michael Hutchinson http://mjhutchinson.com _______________________________________________ Mono-list maillist - Mono-list@lists.ximian.com http://lists.ximian.com/mailman/listinfo/mono-list
