Quote "so my team plays a double role there (OpenSUSE) or distributions where Mono is not included by default"
So if ubuntu did not support mono by including it by default. Then you would package it. Ubuntu would get first class support from the mono team. We would get new versions of mono as they are released and so mono support on ubuntu would be improved. Was I trolling? maybe. This is born from frustration. In which case I apologize and will attempt to be more constructive. On Thu, Aug 12, 2010 at 10:25 AM, Miguel de Icaza <mig...@novell.com> wrote: > >> @miguel By the way what I'm taking from your comments is that if >> ubuntu was to refuse to package mono and include default mono >> applications mono support for ubuntu would actually improve. I wonder >> if someone should tell them...... > > I can not comment as the above sentence turned out to be impossible to > parse. > You might want to clarify, unless you are trolling, in which case, dont > bother. _______________________________________________ Mono-list maillist - Mono-list@lists.ximian.com http://lists.ximian.com/mailman/listinfo/mono-list
