Alright. Then how should I do the templates? Which of these would be
best?:
(a)
[MonoTODO]
public int Count
{
get { throw new NotImplementedException (); }
}
(b)
[MonoTODO]
public int Count
{
// get { throw new NotImplementedException (); }
}
(c)
[MonoTODO]
//public int Count
//{
// get { throw new NotImplementedException (); }
//}
Daniel.
On Fri, 19 Apr 2002, Nick Drochak wrote:
> | I have to say that I don't think that filling out the class definitions
> | is necessarily a good idea. I think it would be much better to leave
> | them commented out, then when someone's adding a new feature that relies
> | on the implementation of some method the compiler will tell them that
> | it's not implemented as opposed to them having to track it down at
> | runtime. ideally the only things that should throw
> | NotImplementedExceptions are implementations of some interface methods.
> |
>
> I have to agree with this.
>
> As far as testing goes, it will become useless to see a thousand errors in
> the unit tests when 99% are just NotImplemented exceptions. What we want to
> see are real live bugs.
>
> Nick D.
>
_______________________________________________
Mono-list maillist - [EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://lists.ximian.com/mailman/listinfo/mono-list
