Miguel de Icaza wrote: > Ideally, yes. The idea is to make sure that our implementation does > what it advertises it does. Sometimes a change on the code will have > side effects, and this will help catch those side effects right away, > rather than a few weeks or months down the line when it will be harder > to debug.
+1. I think "Unit testing for compliance" is a whole different thing from the typical "unit testing for catching the majority of bugs". Brad -- Read my web log at http://www.quality.nu/dotnetguy/ _______________________________________________ Mono-list maillist - [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://lists.ximian.com/mailman/listinfo/mono-list
