just a note: Microsoft's End User License Agreement (EULA) for their .NET Framework SDK prohibits disclosure of results of any benchmark tests without the permission of MS. So, be careful. (http://www.southern-storm.com.au/pnet_faq.html#q1_4)
Regards, Jaak Stefan Matthias Aust wrote: > From: "Guenther Roith" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > > Over at Portable.net there's a benchmark called pnetmark. > > I get > > Sieve ... 12815 > Loop ... 76567 > Logic ... 116225 > String ... 1804 > Float ... 2367 > Method ... 26011 > > PNetMark rating is 15267 > > for MS .NET and > > Sieve ... 9459 > Loop ... 22552 > Logic ... 13364 > String ... -2093 > Float ... (doesn't terminate) > > for mono from CVS. I also get the strange negative number (otherwise I'd > guess the higher the better) for strings and the float test seems not to > terminate - I waited for more than a minute. For the precompiled mono 0.11 > I get > > Sieve ... 5448 > Loop ... 2179 > Logic ... 13089 > String ... -1894 <---- > Float ... 73 > Method ... -12420 > > PNetMark rating is -2147483648 > > and at the "<---" my system starts swapping and a message box pops up which > tells me that memory is low. After clicking OK, the benchmark continues. > > The numbers for mint (from CVS) are completely strange: > > Sieve ... 12877 > Loop ... -1 > Logic ... 142 > String ... 409 > Float ... 16 > Method ... -17 > > PNetMark rating is -2147483648 > > bye > -- > Stefan Matthias Aust // > www.3plus4software.de // Inter Deum Et Diabolum Semper Musica Est > > _______________________________________________ > Mono-list maillist - [EMAIL PROTECTED] > http://lists.ximian.com/mailman/listinfo/mono-list _______________________________________________ Mono-list maillist - [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://lists.ximian.com/mailman/listinfo/mono-list
